Friday, June 10, 2005

Popperianism Explored

Today I decided to try out Popper's system. Knowing that the fact that, every previous day, when I took the train south from my flat I got to LSE, has no predictive value for what will happen if I take it south today, I made a "bold conjecture" and decided to get to LSE by heading north.

Does anyone know if some place named "Glasgow" is near LSE? I went into a pub to ask, but when I said I didn't know who the Rangers were, I got my head bashed in.

17 Comments:

At 3:52 PM , Blogger Bob said...

Does anyone know if some place named "Glasgow" is near LSE?

It wasn't the last time I checked, but of course this doesn't answer your question...

(And no, this stupid wisecrack should not be construed as an endorsement of Gene's caricature.)

 
At 10:56 AM , Anonymous Julius Blumfeld said...

"I made a "bold conjecture" and decided to get to LSE by heading north."

The earth being a sphere, what's the problem? It'll just take you a bit longer.

 
At 12:36 PM , Blogger Gene Callahan said...

I think the trains stop at the North Sea.

In any case, since I'm trying out Popper's epistemology, I must protest the idea that the Earth is round is certainly not a proven fact -- it merely hasn't been falsified yet.

 
At 2:06 PM , Blogger Bob said...

Gene said:

In any case, since I'm trying out Popper's epistemology, I must protest the idea that the Earth is round is certainly not a proven fact -- it merely hasn't been falsified yet.

I must confess that I'm all mixed up at this point. Sarcasm aside, what are you taking to be Popper's position? Are you saying he fails to understand Hume's critique of induction (and hence is stupid), or are you saying he takes Hume's critique too seriously (and hence is stupid)? I gather that you think Popper is stupid, but I'm not sure what he did to offend you.

 
At 4:04 PM , Blogger Gene Callahan said...

Hume's critique, which is essentially Popper's, applies to what Peirce called "crude inductivism," which none of the major inductive thinkers -- not Bacon, not Boyle, not Mill, not Peirce -- actually endorsed. They simply fail to recognize the use of induction as a means of lending credence to the hypothesis of a true causal factor. My upcoming response to Lester will go into this in detail.

 
At 5:13 PM , Blogger Bob said...

Gene,

I still don't understand your blog post, then. Popper could certainly handle your situation in his framework. He would form the falsifiable conjecture that going south gets you to LSE, and this prediction would (I predict) be verified. In contrast, the conjecture that going north would also work would be quickly falsified.

In any event, I don't see why your "bold conjecture" is supposed to be an example of what Popper advocates. He's trying to explain when and why induction does work, in a manner that can withstand Hume's critique. You are somehow taking Popper to be saying, "Because past examples are no guide to the future, any theory is equally probable." That's not what he's saying at all.

 
At 5:18 AM , Anonymous C. Strong said...

"I made a "bold conjecture" and decided to get to LSE by heading north."

The earth being a sphere, what's the problem? It'll just take you a bit longer.


If we assume that the earth is a sphere, going north will only get you so far, and as you pass the north pole you will now be heading south, directly contradicting the "heading north" attempt, and thus forcing the need to turn around, ending up perched on the north pole.

Assuming that there is a North and a South of course.

 
At 9:11 AM , Blogger Gene Callahan said...

No, Bob, Popper says induction is never valid, and no theories are ever verified. (For real.)

 
At 9:34 AM , Blogger Bob said...

Gene said:

No, Bob, Popper says induction is never valid, and no theories are ever verified. (For real.)

Right, and he's correct. Induction never does prove anything for certain. If there were a nuclear attack or a huge earthquake, then taking the train south might not get you to LSE.

And when I said "verified" I didn't mean "proven true," I meant that it matched up with the prediction.

 
At 12:23 PM , Blogger Gene Callahan said...

No, Popper didn't say induction never proves anything for certain -- no sensible inductivist claimed that it did -- he said induction never gave us any guide to theory truth whatsoever.

 
At 6:07 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just to be clear he said that specific and particular confirming instances can neither prove nor verify general and universal theories and it is the truth or falsity of general and universal theories that we are interested in if we want to increase our knowledge of the world.

A 'bold' conjecture is one which offers the greatest potentially predictive and explanatory possibilities. Clearly one confirming instance of a bold conjecture won't do anything to verify it and neither, if you think about it, will any finite number.

In anycase, what Popper maintains is that all theories are epistemologically, though not psychologically, uncertain. One can be quite psychologically sure that a theory is true while still being open to its epistemological uncertainty.

 
At 10:49 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

State University and a Juris Doctor Degree from Wayne State University Law School.Tsumura & Co.'s "Kampo" Ethical Drug Receives FDA Approval Of IND
cheap phentermine diet pill
For this price we give you fast and descrete shipping

 
At 1:33 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

FREEDOM HEPPINESS HEALTH ....BUY LOW-COST VIAGRA , CHEAP CIALIS LEVITRA ONLINE
Sildenafil citrate, sold under the name Viagra is the first of a new group of medication which allows adequate sexual stimulation, relaxes the blood vessels of the penis and helps erection..More info
AND FREE OF CHARGE TO YOUR HOME DELIVERY


lolita xxx free preteen story sex preteen nude model russian hairless ...



You can make new friends, find the hottest singles, wildest couples and




Free Chat Rooms Free chat rooms and links,




MILF close up black lustful dick screwing



porno gay porno storie free porno videoafrica xxx moms and son porno porno video



Gay fetish sex is just a click away




women younger men pussy clips young horny boy dad gay sex older younger ...



lay there on the floor and rubbed myself into an orgasm girls home alone webcam thinking about it.




What is hardcore lesbian porn sometimes hardcore asian tight ass porn hot lesbians ass teen lesbian sex



porno videos sex porno free gallery mature wmv porno free daily trailers ...

 
At 1:44 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cialis is the only drug which is not only fast acting (works in 30 minutes) but is also know to be effective for as long as 36 hours, thus enabling you to choose the moment that is just right for you as well as your partner[url=http://www.forums.MEDEXTREME.BIZ]buy cheap CIALIS online[/url]

 
At 9:04 AM , Anonymous <a href="http://www.xanga.com/buy_levitra">Buy Levitra</a> said...

Great article! Thanks.

 
At 2:46 PM , Anonymous <a href="http://phentermine1.eamped.com">Phentermine</a> said...

Thanks for interesting article.

 
At 4:50 AM , Anonymous <a href="http://courses.cvcc.vccs.edu/ENG112_GROSS/_Chat_Room/000008fd.htm">Anonimous</a> said...

Excellent website. Good work. Very useful. I will bookmark!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home